
By Paul Alexander Wolf 🇦🇺
While others witnessed the horrors on the ground, in the battlefield of destruction and devastation, I write as a witness from afar, watching what is unfolding in a way that should make the world feel ashamed that this is happening in our century, after the lessons carved into humanity by the last. We once stood before the graves of the past and said never again. But the words were easier than the courage required to uphold them.
This ceasefire is spoken of as if it were a moment of grace. But there is no grace in watching people survive day by day with no water, no fuel, no shelter, no medicine, no safety. There is no peace in a pause that still allows bombs to fall and aid to be blocked. A ceasefire that leaves families starving, hospitals collapsing and children dying is not a ceasefire. It is the continuation of violence by quieter means.
From afar, one sees the pattern with brutal clarity. Gaza is not living through a natural catastrophe. It is living under a policy constructed with intention. Food trucks held at borders. Fuel denied. Medicines delayed until the patients who needed them are gone. Electricity cut so that surgeries cannot proceed and incubators fall silent. Airstrikes launched while the world is told to believe that hostilities have stopped. These are not the accidents of war. They are the architecture of control.
And while the justifications shift, the consequences do not. A child feels hunger the same way whether it is caused by neglect or by strategy. A hospital without power does not ask whether its darkness was the result of politics or indifference. Oxygen does not care about ideology. It only cares about whether it reaches the lungs of the living.
Some will say these measures are necessary for security. But true security does not require the suffering of civilians. It does not ask a population to give up its children in exchange for a sense of national protection that will never be found through the destruction of another people. Security that starves is not security. Strategy that leaves newborns dying for lack of power is not strategy. These acts reflect not defence, but a decision to allow suffering to continue under a different name.
And it is this decision that the world must confront. Because when injustice becomes systematic, when suffering persists not by chance but by choice, silence becomes a form of participation. The nations of the world, especially those that stand tallest in their claims of democracy and human rights, must ask themselves how it is possible that in an age of global connection, an entire people can be left without the basic means to live.
What we are witnessing is not simply the failure of politics. It is the failure of human empathy on an international scale. It is the failure to remember that the lives threatened in Gaza are made of the same hopes, dreams and dignity that shaped our own families, our own histories, our own understanding of what it means to be human. These are mothers and fathers, teachers and students, children who want to play, elders who want to rest. They are not the abstract symbols that political rhetoric turns them into. They are people. And they bleed the same red blood that every human being shares.
From afar, I can see that what is happening now will echo into future years. The rubble will be cleared one day, but the memory of abandonment will not be erased so easily. A generation of children will grow up remembering that when they needed protection, when they needed food, when they needed medicine, the world debated their right to survive. And that memory will shape the moral landscape long after the bombs stop falling.
The truth is simple, even if the politics are not. If a ceasefire still allows a population to be bombed, starved and denied medical care, then it is not peace. It is only the illusion of peace, a smoke screen drawn across a suffering that continues uninterrupted.
One day, when the archives are opened and the testimonies collected, the world will not be asked whether it was complicated. It will be asked whether we acted. Whether we spoke. Whether we understood that neutrality in the face of injustice is not a virtue. It is a choice to stand with the oppressor. That truth has been written into every chapter of human history, and this moment will be no exception.
And still, even with all the devastation, what lingers most is not the smoke or the rubble, but the unbearable quiet of a world that has learned to look away. A world that has trained itself to scroll past suffering as if it were a passing inconvenience instead of a cry for help. The quiet is the real indictment. Not because the world is powerless, but because it has grown comfortable with the idea that power belongs only to those who hold the weapons, not to those who hold the truth.
But there is another truth we forget. In every age of injustice, it was not the powerful who shifted history, but the people who refused to accept the lie that nothing could be done. Change has never arrived to the sound of applause. It begins in discomfort, in conscience, in the moment a single person decides to stop pretending that cruelty is inevitable.
Gaza is asking the world that question now. Asking whether we are capable of seeing a human being as a human being even when politics tell us to see an enemy. Asking whether we still recognize that the right to breathe, to eat, to heal, to be protected from harm is not a privilege that can be given or taken away, but the foundation of any civilisation worthy of the name.
And what will we say when that question reaches us? That we waited for someone else? That we hoped things would improve on their own? That the suffering of a whole people was too complicated to confront? History does not reward hesitation. It judges it.
There is a Palestinian child tonight who has never known a sky without fear, who has never slept a night unbroken, never eaten a meal without uncertainty. This child is not a headline, not a statistic, not a distant abstraction. This child is the measure of us. Not because their life is more precious than any other, but because it has been treated as if it were worth nothing at all.
Our task is not to rescue a people with words. Words alone are never enough. Our task is to make sure those words are guided by moral clarity, backed by action and free from the cowardice of neutrality. Gaza does not need our sympathy. Gaza needs us to reclaim the simple, ancient truth that no child should suffer for the ambitions of men.
And so I write, not to repeat what has been said before, but to insist on something that should never have been forgotten: that humanity is indivisible. That suffering anywhere diminishes us everywhere. That the measure of this moment will not be how carefully we navigated politics, but how fiercely we defended life.
The world will remember the policies that brought Gaza to its knees, but it will also remember who spoke up, who stepped forward, who refused to accept a ceasefire that still lets children die. And when that memory is written, may it be said that we did not bow to silence, that we did not hide behind distance, that we stood where conscience demanded we stand.
Not because it was easy, but because it was hard.
Hard to keep raising our voices when so many preferred the comfort of silence.
Hard to stand against a wall of oppression built from fear, indifference and power.
Hard to insist on the dignity of a people the world had learned to overlook.
Hard to say that the life of a Palestinian child is worth the same as any child on Earth and mean it without hesitation.
We choose to oppose this injustice in this century not because it is easy, but because it is hard, and because our humanity demands nothing less.
This is the hill history has placed before us. And we climb it not for glory, not for recognition, but because the alternative is to accept a world where suffering is ignored and silence is excused. That is not a world worthy of us. That is not a world worthy of the children who look to us for protection.
We stand, even from afar, because it is hard.
And because it is right.